MCQs on Order VIII, Rule 1 – Written Statement & Set-off | CPC 1908 | HEC LAW GAT, ADPP & Judiciary Exam Preparation 2025

MCQs on Order VIII, Rule 1 – Written Statement & Set-off | CPC 1908 | HEC LAW GAT, ADPP & Judiciary Exam Preparation

Prepare for HEC LAW GAT, ADPP, and Judiciary Exams with expertly crafted MCQs on Order VIII, Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) 1908, covering Written Statements and Set-off. Enhance your understanding of legal pleadings, procedural law, and civil litigation principles with auto-scored quizzes, instant feedback, and performance tracking. These multiple-choice questions are designed to help law aspirants, practicing advocates, and judicial candidates master CPC provisions effectively. Start practicing now to excel in your law exams and legal career!

1)When should the defendant present a written statement of his defense? a) At any time before judgment b) At or before the first hearing or within the time permitted by the Court c) Only after the plaintiff's evidence is recorded d) Only after the cross-examination of witnesses

2)What should the defendant produce in court along with the written statement? a) The list of plaintiff’s witnesses b) All documents in his possession or power on which he bases his defense c) Affidavits from third parties d) Only oral submissions

3)If a defendant does not file a written statement, when should he produce documents on which he relies? a) During the final hearing b) At the first hearing c) After the plaintiff submits evidence d) At any time before appeal

4)What is the ordinary time limit for filing the written statement? a) 7 days b) 15 days c) 30 days d) 60 days

5)How many adjournments can be granted for presenting a written statement? a) 1 b) 2 c) 3 d) Unlimited

6)What must a defendant do if he relies on additional documents in support of his defense? a) File a separate suit b) Submit them to the plaintiff for verification c) Enter them in a list annexed to the written statement d) Obtain the court’s permission before preparing the list

7)If the list of documents is not filed along with the written statement, what additional time is allowed to file it? a) 5 days b) 7 days c) 10 days d) No additional time is allowed

8)Without the leave of the Court, can a document not entered in the list be received in evidence? a) Yes, it can be admitted anytime b) No, unless the Court grants permission c) Yes, but only during cross-examination d) No, under any circumstances

9)What documents are exempt from the requirement of listing in the written statement? a) Documents used for cross-examination b) Witness affidavits c) Plaintiff’s documents d) Secondary evidence

10)What happens if a written statement is not filed within the prescribed time? a) The court may dismiss the suit b) The defendant loses the right to defend c) The court may proceed ex parte d) The plaintiff must withdraw the suit

11)When should the defendant present the written statement? a) At the final hearing b) At or before the first hearing or within the time permitted by the Court c) Within 60 days from the date of summons d) After the plaintiff presents all his evidence

12) What is the ordinary period allowed for filing the written statement? a) 15 days b) 30 days c) 45 days d) 60 days

13) How many adjournments can the Court grant for presenting the written statement? a) One b) Two c) Three d) No adjournments allowed

14)What documents must the defendant produce in Court along with the written statement? a)the documents that favor the plaintiff b) All documents in his possession or power on which he bases his defense or claim for set-off c) Only those documents requested by the plaintiff d) The Court decides which documents must be produced) Only

15) What happens if a defendant relies on additional documents not filed with the written statement? a) They must be entered in a list annexed to the written statement b) The plaintiff must approve the submission c) The documents will be automatically rejected d) The Court will only consider documents submitted after cross-examination

16)If no list of documents is annexed or presented at the first hearing, how much additional time is granted? a) 5 days b) 7 days c) 10 days d) No extra time is allowed

17)What happens if a document required to be in the list is not entered? a) It shall not be received in evidence without the leave of the Court b) It can be filed at any time during the trial c) It must be produced only at the appeal stage d) The plaintiff must give permission for its use

18)Which of the following documents is NOT affected by the restriction on admissibility? a) Documents produced for cross-examining the plaintiff’s witnesses b) Documents submitted after the final arguments c) Documents submitted after the decree is passed d) Documents discovered after the trial ends

19)Can a defendant hand over a document to a witness for refreshing memory even if it was not listed? a) Yes b) No c) Only with the permission of the plaintiff d) Only in criminal cases

20) What is the significance of a written statement in a civil suit? a) It contains the defendant’s defense and counterclaims b) It is an optional document that may or may not be filed c) It is only used to request adjournments d) It is not required if the defendant is absent

21)What is presumed by the Court if the defendant fails to present a written statement before the date fixed for hearing? a) The suit is dismissed b) The Court will impose a fine on the defendant c) The Court shall presume that the contents of the plaint are true d) The case is automatically decided in favor of the plaintiff What is presumed by the Court if the defendant fails to present a written statement before the date fixed for hearing? a) The suit is dismissed b) The Court will impose a fine on the defendant c) The Court shall presume that the contents of the plaint are true d) The case is automatically decided in favor of the plaintiff

22) Can the Court allow the defendant to present a written statement after the deadline? a) No, under any circumstances b) Yes, if the defendant applies in writing with a just and sufficient cause supported by an affidavit c) Yes, without any conditions d) Only if the plaintiff agrees

23)What is required for a defendant to seek permission for late submission of a written statement? a) A verbal request to the judge b) A written application with a just and sufficient cause supported by an affidavit c) A letter from the plaintiff allowing the late submission d) The defendant must appear in person and submit a new plaint

24)Can the Court extend the period for submitting a written statement beyond the limit fixed under Rule 1? a) Yes, the Court has unlimited discretion b) No, the permission to present a written statement shall not extend beyond the period fixed in Rule 1 c) Yes, but only if both parties consent d) Only if the Supreme Court allows it

25) What is the significance of Rule 1-A in civil procedure? a) It encourages timely submission of written statements by the defendant b) It allows indefinite delays in filing written statements c) It gives the plaintiff the right to modify the plaint at any time d) It prevents the plaintiff from submitting new evidence

26)If a defendant fails to file a written statement and does not seek permission for late submission, what happens? a) The Court will presume that the plaint’s contents are true b) The case will be dismissed c) The defendant can submit the written statement at any stage d) The Court will automatically grant an extension

27) Under Rule 1-B of Order VIII, what is the defendant required to furnish? a) Additional copies of the written statement only b) Additional copies of the written statement and documents annexed therewith c) Only original copies of documents d) No additional copies are required

28)The additional copies of the written statement and documents annexed must be supplied to whom? a) The Court only b) The plaintiff c) The witnesses d) The police

29) What is the main purpose of requiring additional copies of the written statement and annexed documents? a) To ensure the plaintiff has access to the defendant’s defense and evidence b) To increase the burden on the defendant c) To allow the Court to make copies for its own records d) To delay the proceedings

30) What will happen if the defendant fails to furnish additional copies of the written statement and annexed documents? a) The plaintiff will be barred from presenting evidence b) The Court may impose a penalty or take appropriate action c) The case will be automatically decided in favor of the defendant d) The defendant will be arrested

31) Who is responsible for ensuring that the additional copies of the written statement and annexed documents are furnished? a) The plaintiff b) The Court c) The defendant d) The police

32) According to Order VIII, Rule 2, what must the defendant raise in his pleading? a) Only the denial of the plaintiff’s claims b) All matters showing the suit is not maintainable or the transaction is void or voidable c) Only facts that support the plaintiff’s case d) Only legal arguments without mentioning facts

33) What happens if the defendant does not raise special matters in his pleading? a) The Court will automatically consider them during the hearing b) The Court will reject the plaint c) It may take the opposite party by surprise or raise issues of fact not arising out of the plaint d) The defendant will be disqualified from contesting the case

34) Which of the following defenses must be specially pleaded under Order VIII, Rule 2? a) Fraud b) Limitation c) Payment and performance d) All of the above

35) If a defendant claims that the transaction is void or voidable, what must he do? a) Raise this defense in his written statement b) Wait until the final argument to bring up this defense c) Only mention it if asked by the Court d) Ignore it and focus on procedural issues

36) Which of the following cannot be raised as a new fact under Order VIII, Rule 2? a) The suit is not maintainable b) The transaction is fraudulent c) The plaintiff's name is spelled incorrectly d) The transaction is illegal

37)The purpose of requiring special pleading of new facts is to: a) Allow defendants to delay the trial b) Ensure that both parties are aware of all issues beforehand c) Let the Court determine facts without any pleading d) Make the plaintiff’s case stronger automatically

38) Under Order VIII, Rule 2, which of the following facts must be specially pleaded? a) Illegality of the transaction b) Performance of an agreement c) Release of liability by the plaintiff d) All of the above

39) According to Order VIII, Rule 3, how should a defendant deny the allegations made by the plaintiff? a) By generally denying all allegations in the plaint b) By remaining silent about certain allegations c) By specifically dealing with each allegation of fact he does not admit d) By filing a counterclaim instead of a written statement

40)What is not sufficient for the defendant when denying the grounds alleged by the plaintiff? a) A general denial of all allegations b) A specific denial of each fact c) A written statement with documentary proof d) A reply limited to legal issues only

41) What must a defendant do when he does not admit the truth of an allegation made by the plaintiff? a) Provide specific denials to each fact b) Accept the claim as true c) Request an adjournment to file a counterclaim d) Ignore the allegation and proceed with arguments

42) Which of the following is excluded from the requirement of specific denial under Order VIII, Rule 3? a) Allegations regarding fraud b) Allegations regarding breach of contract c) Allegations regarding damages d) Allegations regarding misrepresentation

43)Why is damage an exception to the rule of specific denial? a) Because the Court assumes damages are always correct b) Because damages are determined by the Court based on evidence c) Because the plaintiff has the burden of proving damages d) Because denying damages is not legally allowed

44)What may happen if a defendant only denies allegations generally instead of specifically? a) The Court may presume the allegations are admitted b) The Court will dismiss the plaintiff's case c) The defendant will be allowed extra time to file another written statement Q6: What may happen if a defendant only denies allegations generally instead of specifically? a) The Court may presume the allegations are admitted b) The Court will dismiss the plaintiff's case c) The defendant will be allowed extra time to file another written statement d) The Court will allow the defendant to present a verbal denial during the trial

45) The purpose of requiring specific denial in a written statement is to: a) Allow the Court to identify disputed facts clearly b) Make the plaintiff's case easier to prove c) Let the defendant file a counterclaim instead of a defense d) Ensure that all allegations are automatically accepted

46) What is required from a defendant when denying an allegation of fact in the plaint? a) He must deny the allegation vaguely b) He must avoid answering the allegation directly c) He must answer the point of substance d) He may remain silent, and the Court will assume a denial

47)What is an evasive denial? a) A general denial without addressing the substance of the allegation b) A detailed explanation supported by evidence c) A refusal to file a written statement d) A denial of the legal consequences of an allegation

48) If the plaintiff alleges that the defendant received a certain sum of money, what would be an evasive denial? a) Denying only the exact amount mentioned in the plaint b) Denying receiving any part of the money or stating how much was received c) Admitting the claim partially and seeking an adjournment d) Accepting the entire amount but questioning the liability

49)If a fact is alleged with diverse circumstances, what is required in the defendant’s denial? a) The defendant must deny only the core fact b) The defendant must deny both the fact and the circumstances c) The defendant may choose which part to deny d) The defendant does not need to address the circumstances

50)What happens if a defendant evades answering an allegation properly? a) The Court may treat the allegation as admitted b) The Court will strike out the written statement c) The Court will allow another chance to file a new denial d) The case will be dismissed

51) Why is evasive denial discouraged in legal pleadings? a) It creates unnecessary legal arguments b) It allows the plaintiff to introduce new claims c) It prevents the Court from identifying disputed issues properly d) It leads to automatic acceptance of all claims

52)What happens if a defendant does not specifically deny an allegation of fact in the plaint? a) The Court disregards the allegation b) The allegation is taken to be admitted c) The plaintiff must prove the allegation again d) The defendant gets another opportunity to deny it later

53)Under Rule 5, how should a defendant deny an allegation in the plaint? a) By making a general denial of all claims b) By specifically denying each fact or denying it by necessary implication c) By arguing against the plaintiff’s interpretation of the law d) By ignoring the allegations and focusing on counterclaims

54)The rule of specific denial does not apply in cases where the defendant is __? a) A minor or a person under disability b) A government official c) Representing multiple defendants d) Filing a counterclaim

55)If a defendant fails to specifically deny an allegation, can the Court still require proof? a) No, the allegation is automatically accepted b) Yes, at the discretion of the Court c) No, unless the plaintiff requests proof d) Yes, but only if the defendant requests it

56)Which of the following is NOT a consequence of failing to deny a fact specifically? a) The fact is presumed to be admitted b) The defendant can introduce a new denial at any time c) The plaintiff is not required to prove the fact d) The Court may still require additional proof

57)If a defendant states that an allegation is “not admitted”, what does it mean legally? a) It amounts to a denial b) It is considered an admission c) The defendant has neither admitted nor denied the fact d) The Court must reject the claim

58) Under Order VIII, Rule 6, when can a defendant claim a set-off against the plaintiff’s demand? a) Only before filing the written statement b) At the first hearing of the suit or later with Court’s permission c) Only at the final stage of the trial d) Only after the plaintiff has presented all evidence

59)A defendant can only claim a set-off if the sum of money is __? a) An unascertained amount that can be adjusted later b) A definite and ascertained amount legally recoverable c) A future expected claim d) Based on damages due to an uncertain loss

60)Which of the following is NOT a requirement for a valid set-off? a) The amount must be legally recoverable b) The parties must hold the same character in both claims c) The defendant must provide a separate plaint for set-off d) The amount should not exceed the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Court

61)What effect does a written statement containing a claim for set-off have? a) It is treated as a cross-suit and allows a final judgment on both claims b) It requires a separate suit to be filed for resolution c) It only reduces the plaintiff’s claim but does not affect judgment d) It has no legal effect unless the plaintiff agrees

62)If a defendant claims set-off, which rules apply to his written statement? a) The same rules as an ordinary written statement b) Special rules only applicable to counterclaims c) Different rules that require separate filing fees d) No rules apply since it is an independent claim

63)In which of the following situations can a defendant claim a valid set-off? a) A sues B for trespass, and B claims set-off for a promissory note of Rs.1,000 from A b) A sues B for breach of contract, and B claims set-off for emotional distress caused by A c) A sues B for land possession, and B claims set-off for past unpaid rent d) A sues B and C together, but B alone has a separate claim against A

64) Can a defendant claim set-off for an unascertained amount of compensation? a) Yes, as long as the compensation is legally valid b) No, because set-off requires a definite and ascertained amount c) Yes, if it is based on a contract between the parties d) No, unless the Court allows it

65)In which scenario can a set-off NOT be claimed? a) A sues B on a bill of exchange for Rs.500, and B holds a judgment against A for Rs.1,000 b) A sues B and C jointly for Rs.1,000, and B alone claims set-off for Rs.500 due to him from A c) A owes Rs.1,000 to a partnership firm of B and C. B dies, leaving C surviving. A sues C for Rs.1,500, and C claims set-off for Rs.1,000 d) A sues B for a loan repayment, and B claims set-off for an unpaid contract debt from A

66)According to Order VIII, Rule 7, when a defendant relies on multiple grounds of defence or set-off, how should they be presented? a) In a single paragraph for conciseness b) Separately and distinctly, as far as possible c) Briefly summarized at the end of the written statement d) Only orally before the Court

67) Why must distinct facts supporting defence or set-off be stated separately? a) To ensure clarity and prevent confusion in legal proceedings b) Because the plaintiff has the right to object to every claim c) To allow the defendant to alter claims later in trial d) To increase the length of the written statement

68)A defendant raises two distinct grounds of defence—one based on limitation and the other based on fraud. What should he do according to Order VIII, Rule 7? a) Combine both defences in a single statement b) State them separately and distinctly in the written statement c) Mention only the stronger defence and ignore the weaker one d) Submit them after the trial starts

69)If a defendant fails to separate distinct grounds of defence in his written statement, what could be the consequence? a) The Court may require him to amend his written statement b) The Court will dismiss his written statement entirely c) The Court will automatically accept only the first ground of defence d) The plaintiff will get a judgment in their favor

70)Order VIII, Rule 7 applies to: a) Only cases involving set-off b) Only cases involving multiple defendants c) Cases where the defence or set-off is based on multiple distinct facts d) Only cases where the plaintiff is claiming monetary compensation

71)A sues B for breach of contract. B raises two separate defences: (1) The contract was void for illegality, and (2) A had already been paid. How should B present these defences? a) As a single statement, since they both lead to dismissal of the suit b) In two separate and distinct paragraphs in his written statement c) Only mention the stronger defence to avoid confusion d) Raise one defence now and the other during cross-examination

72) Under Order VIII, Rule 8, when can a new ground of defence be raised? a) Only at the time of filing the original written statement b) Before the trial concludes, irrespective of when it arisest c) Only if it arises after the institution of the suit or filing of the written statemen d) Only during cross-examination of the plaintiff

73) Who can raise a new ground of defence under Order VIII, Rule 8? a) Only the defendant b) Only the plaintiff c) Either the defendant or the plaintiff, depending on the circumstances d) Only the Court, by its discretion

74) A defendant files a written statement denying the plaintiff’s claim. However, after filing, a new law is enacted that supports the defendant’s case. What should the defendant do? a) Ignore the new law as it was not included in the original written statement b) File an additional written statement raising the new defence c) Wait until the final arguments to introduce the new defence d) Request the plaintiff to amend his plaint

75) If a new fact arises after the defendant has already filed his written statement, what is the proper legal step under Order VIII, Rule 8? a) The defendant may submit a supplementary written statement incorporating the new ground b) The defendant must wait for the trial to conclude before raising the new fact c) The defendant cannot raise any new defence once the written statement is filed d) The defendant must withdraw his original written statement and file a new one

76)Under Order VIII, Rule 8, when can a plaintiff raise a new ground of defence? a) When the new ground arises after the institution of the suit b) When the original claim becomes invalid c) When the defendant fails to file a written statement d) The plaintiff cannot raise a defence under Rule 8

77)Can the new ground of defence raised under Rule 8 be unrelated to the original suit? a) Yes, any defence can be introduced at any time b) No, it must be relevant to the case and arise after the suit was filed c) Yes, if it benefits the defendant d) No, because new facts can only be presented in appeal proceedings

78) Under Order VIII, Rule 9, when can a party present a subsequent pleading after the written statement? a) Anytime, without restrictions b) Only if the Court grants leave (permission) c) Only if the opposing party consents d) Only during the final arguments

79)A defendant has already filed his written statement. Under Rule 9, when can he file an additional written statement? a) At any time before the judgment is passed b) Only if the Court requires or permits it c) Only if new evidence is discovered d) Only when the plaintiff consents

80)Can a subsequent pleading be filed without Court permission if it is a defence to a set-off? a) Yes, it can be filed without Court permission b) No, Court permission is always required c) Only if it is filed within 30 days of the original written statement d) No, unless the defendant makes a special request

81)Under Rule 9, what power does the Court have regarding additional written statements? a) The Court can require any party to submit a written statement at any time b) The Court can reject any additional pleadings without reason c) The Court can only allow additional pleadings before framing issues d) The Court has no power over subsequent pleadings

82) The plaintiff wants to file a reply to the defendant’s written statement. What must he do under Rule 9? a) File the reply immediately without permission b) Obtain leave of the Court before filing c) Wait for the defendant to submit another written statement d) Amend the original plaint instead

83) A Court directs a plaintiff to file an additional written statement. What must the plaintiff do? a) Comply within the time fixed by the Court b) Refuse to file an additional written statement c) Obtain the defendant’s consent first d) File an appeal against the order

84) If a defendant wants to file an additional written statement after the original has been submitted, but without any new facts, what should the Court do? a) Reject the additional statement unless special circumstances exist b) Automatically allow it c) Allow it only if the plaintiff agrees d) Require the defendant to withdraw the first written statement

85)Under Order VIII, Rule 10, if a party fails to present a written statement within the time fixed by the Court, what can the Court do? a) Automatically dismiss the suit b) Pronounce judgment against the defaulting party c) Extend time indefinitely for filing the written statement d) Transfer the case to another Court

86)If a defendant does not submit a written statement despite being required by the Court, what discretionary power does the Court have? a) It must pass a decree in favor of the plaintiff b) It may pronounce judgment or pass any other appropriate order c) It must grant additional time d) It must strike out the plaint

87)In case of failure to file a written statement, the Court’s order under Rule 10 is: a) Mandatory – The Court must pass a judgment b) Discretionary – The Court may pass a judgment or another order as it thinks fit c) Void – The Court cannot take any action d) Conditional – The Court must first consult the plaintiff

88)If the defendant does not file a written statement, can the Court still decide the case on merits? a) No, it must pass a decree against the defendant b) Yes, the Court may examine the facts and decide accordingly c) No, the case must be dismissed d) Yes, but only if the plaintiff agrees

89)Can a defendant request the Court to accept a written statement after the deadline has passed? a) Yes, but only if sufficient cause is shown b) No, the Court has no power to allow late submissions c) Yes, but only with the plaintiff’s consent d) No, once the time has lapsed, the defendant loses all rights

90)A defendant fails to file his written statement within the Court’s prescribed time. What should the plaintiff do next? a) File an application requesting the Court to pronounce judgment b) Wait indefinitely for the defendant’s response c) Withdraw the suit d) File a new case against the defendant

91) Can Rule 10 be applied against a plaintiff if he fails to file a reply to a set-off claimed by the defendant? a) No, Rule 10 applies only to defendants b) Yes, the Court may pass an order against the plaintiff c) No, the case will automatically end d) Yes, but only if the defendant requests it

92) If a party fails to file a written statement, but the suit involves complex legal or factual issues, what is the best course of action for the Court? a) Pass an automatic decree without hearing the plaintiff b) Still consider evidence and decide on merits c) Strike out the defense immediately d) Transfer the case to another Court

93) Under Order VIII, Rule 11, who is required to provide an address for service? a) Only the plaintiff b) Only the defendant c) Every party appearing in a suit or proceeding d) Only the witness

94) When must a party file their address for service in Court? a) At any time during the proceedings b) Before or on the date fixed in the summons, notice, or process c) Only if the Court asks for it d) After the case has been decided

95)Where is the address for service recorded after being filed by a party? a) In the case file only b) In the lawyer’s personal records c) In the Register of Suits maintained under Order IV, Rule 2 d) In the police records

96) Which of the following Order VII rules apply to addresses for service under Rule 11 of Order VIII? a) Rules 20, 23, 24, and 25 b) Rules 10, 11, 12, and 13 c) Rules 30, 31, 32, and 33 d) No rules from Order VII apply

97)What happens if a party fails to provide an address for service? a) The Court will dismiss the suit b) The Court may order service of process at any address available on record c) The party loses the right to contest the case d) The case is automatically transferred to another Court

98)Why is it important for a party to provide an accurate address for service? a) To ensure proper communication of summons, notices, and other legal documents b) To give the opposing party an advantage c) To increase court fees d) To avoid filing a written statement

99)What is the consequence of failing to file an address for service under Order VIII, Rule 12? a) The party’s case is automatically dismissed b) The party’s defence may be struck out c) The party may be fined but allowed to continue the case d) No consequences, as filing an address is optional

100) If a defendant fails to file an address for service, how is he treated under the law? a) As if he had never defended the case b) As if he had won the case c) As if he had withdrawn his claim d) As if he was a witness

101)Can the Court strike out a defence for failure to file an address for service on its own motion? a) Yes, the Court can act suo moto b) No, only the plaintiff can request it c) Yes, but only after multiple warnings d) No, the Court cannot interfere in such matters

102)Apart from acting suo moto, who else can apply to the Court for an order under Rule 12? a) Only the defendant b) Any party to the suit c) Only the judge d) The police

103) Why is filing an address for service important in legal proceedings? a) It helps the party avoid penalties and ensures proper communication b) It reduces court fees c) It helps in getting the case delayed d) It prevents the case from going to the Supreme Court

104)What happens if a party’s defence is struck out due to failure to file an address? a) The party can refile the case anytime b) The party is treated as if they never defended the case c) The case is transferred to another court d) The party is fined but allowed to continue

105)What must the written statement of a defendant contain under Rule 13? a) A list of all witnesses b) A list of legal representatives who may be made a party upon the defendant’s death c) A list of all lawyers practicing in the same court d) A list of property owned by the defendant

106) Under Order VIII, Rule 13(1)(b), what additional information must be included with the list of legal representatives? a) Name of the judge hearing the case b) The plaintiff’s previous case history c) The name of the person responsible for informing the Court about the defendant’s death d) The defendant’s bank account details

107) Can a defendant amend the list of legal representatives during the suit? a) No, once filed, the list cannot be changed b) Yes, but only with the plaintiff’s permission c) Yes, the defendant may file an amended list at any time d) No, unless the Court orders it

108)Can a defendant nominate a different person to notify the Court of his death? a) No, the nomination is permanent b) Yes, under sub-rule (2)(b), the defendant may nominate another person c) No, only the plaintiff can do so d) Only if the case is related to property disputes

109) What happens if a defendant fails to file a list of legal representatives? a) The case is transferred to another court b) The Court may strike out the defendant’s defence c) The plaintiff automatically wins the case d) The defendant must pay a fine

110)Can the Court recall its order striking out a defence for non-filing of legal representatives? a) No, once struck out, it cannot be reversed b) Yes, if the defendant later submits the list and provides a sufficient cause for delay c) Yes, but only if the plaintiff agrees d) No, unless a higher court intervenes

MCQs on Order VIII, Rule 1 – Written Statement & Set-off | CPC 1908 | HEC LAW GAT, ADPP & Judiciary Exam Preparation

Share this:

Like this: